| This page gives some background theory on equalising anchors and describes,
with illustrations, how to equalise anchors using either slings or the rope.
Equalising anchors with the rope
|
Anchor Angles |
| You’ve got to the top of you’re climb and you’re about to set up a belay. Alternatively you might want to set up a top rope. The instruction book says to use two anchors and to equalise them. It also says that the angle between the two anchors must be less than 120º. Why? |
| Lets look at the basics. If you have two anchors, one above the other, equalise them, then load them by trusting your life to them, each anchor will obviously be holding half of your weight. In this arrangement (the ideal), there’s a downwards force on the each anchor of half a climber’s weight and no horizontal force. |
| Now consider a more usual configuration of two anchors side by side and equalised. |
![]() |
| Again you load the anchor by hanging in your harness. Unless you’ve studied physics or engineering then you’ll have to trust me on this bit. If the angle between the two anchors is “a” then the load in the sling going to each anchor is |
![]() |
| Now this time there’s a horizontal force pulling the anchors inwards of |
![]() |
| There’s still of course a vertical force on each anchor of ½W So, what’s this telling us? Firstly, the load in the slings connecting you to the anchors has gone
up. For two vertical anchors it was L = ½ weight For the case where there is an angle, it’s now |
![]() |
| but cos(½ a) is always less than one so the load always goes up.
Lo and behold, if a = 120º, L = weight. This means that despite you having two equalised anchors, each anchor is
now taking your entire body weight. If the angle is greater than 120º then
each anchor will be taking more than your body weight! It’s no longer worth
having two anchors any more as each one is more likely to fail. OK, so where is this increased load actually coming from? Well its not
out of thin air, if it was then we’d have solved the world’s energy crisis.
What happens is that there’s always a downwards pull on the anchors of ½W
which remains constant regardless of the angle. As soon as you move away
from two in-line anchors you get a horizontal force pulling the two anchors
in together. It’s the combination of this inwards force together with the
vertical force that creates the increased load in the slings and hence the
anchors. If you keep increasing the angle past 120º all the way up to 180º (horizontal anchors) something weird happens. Although you’re only loading the rope/sling with your weight the load on the anchor is |
![]() |
| but cos(90) = 0 Dividing anything by zero gives infinity. i.e you’ve put an infinite load on the anchors which will guarantee failure! In practice this won’t happen as the rope will stretch which will reduce the angle to a fraction less than 180º so you’ll never get the mythical infinite force. With two 180º anchors you’ve got a Tyrolean traverse. These loading calculations show why Tyroleans are so bloody dangerous! You’re putting HUGE loads on the anchors and the rope. It also explains why a bow will shoot an arrow a hell of a lot further than you can throw one, and why you shouldn’t three way load a karabiner. You can use this 180º loading to positive advantage in other ways. If you
get a vehicle stuck, rather than trying to tow or winch it out directly, fix
a rope from the vehicle to a tree, then go to the mid point of the rope and
pull at 90º rather than along it. Hey presto, one huge load is applied to
the stuck vehicle. So, when equalising anchors don’t have more than 120º between the anchors as you’re actually increasing the likelihood of anchor failure. Unfortunately 120º isn’t that easy to visualise so try and keep the angle to 90º, a right angle. Then you know you’ve got a bit in hand if need be. To reduce the angle between any two anchors, lengthen the connecting slings/rope
|
| back to top |
Equalising anchors with a sling |
| You're at the belay station and the second is not going to lead through, this means you can't use the rope to tie in and equalise the anchors, you've got to use slings. There's several methods of doing this. Firstly, lets assume you've got two anchors to equalise. There are two ways to do this, both work perfectly well. |
| Back to top
|
Equalising anchors with the rope |
| You're either at the top of a climb or at an intermediate stance where the second is going to lead through. You can now use the rope(s) to tie in. This is much easier than using slings but the disadvantage is that you use rope, generally not a problem if you're already at the top but it might be if the next pitch is a long one. There's also another disadvantage that I'll come to later. However, personally, I always tie in with the rope. |
|
If you need to equalise even more anchors then you'll need lots of spare rope. You could of course use slings to equalise two anchors, thus bringing them to a single krab which the rope then goes to. The following description assume you've got lots of anchors and you're using a rigging rope, (more applicable to a top rope scenario). Tie a figure of eight in one end of the rope and clip it to the first anchor. Walk back to where the stance is and thread the rope through a krab, however, make the tie in point further away from the anchors than you need. Now go to the second anchor and thread the rope through the krab. Don't clove hitch it. Now walk back to the tie in point and loosely clip the rope through the krab that you left there. Keep on like this until you reach the last anchor. Clove hitch the rope to this anchor. Go back to the tie in point. Pick up the krab that has all the bights of rope through it and by pulling on the ropes you can adjust the lengths so that all anchors are equalised. Now you'll find out why you wanted extra rope and the tie in point was further away from the anchors than you needed. Remove the krab, take all the bights of rope and tie a huge figure of eight knot with all the bights. The resulting loops do not all have to be the same length, in fact it will be a miracle if they are. You only need to clip in to one of the loops, not all of them. There is one big problem with using the rope to tie in. A big advantage is that you can use anchors a long way back from the crag edge without having to carry up loads and loads of slings. This is also the disadvantage. Climbing ropes are dynamic and they stretch. If you've got a heavy second and they fall off then the ropes from you to the anchors will stretch. You will be pulled a couple of inches off your stance and due to the way nylon behaves (visco-elasticity in technical terms) when the second gets back on the rock you will stay where you are in your new belay position. If the inept second falls off again then you're going to get dragged forward again as the ropes stretch yet again. The best advice I can offer on this is if you think there's a good chance the second will come off then belay a little further back from the edge than you normally would. I've ended up about 12" further forward from where I started when the second spent a considerable time dangling on the ropes. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the thinner your climbing ropes the worst this problem is going to be.
|
| Home page |
DisclaimerClimbing is dangerous and setting up a good belay is a vital safety task. If you don't understand what you're doing, don't climb. Before you use any of the techniques described here, make sure you actually understand what you're doing. If you don't then seek professional instruction, or at the very least, practice in a safe environment until you do. Think what will happen if an anchor fails, in a safe environment, unclip an anchor to simulate a failed anchor - the belay point shouldn't move if you've got it right (do not go unclipping anchors half way up a cliff!). |